Why carbon dating is wrong dating carte de visite

Her report in 2009 confirmed the presence of collagen and other proteins that bacteria do not make.In 2011, a Swedish team found soft tissue and biomolecules in the bones of another creature from the time of the dinosaurs, a Mosasaur, which was a giant lizard that swam in shallow ocean waters.This was news to him, and contradicted prior statements and documents from the university.He is currently seeking relief in a legal action for wrongful termination and religious discrimination by California State University Northridge (CSUN).

From 2007 through 2011 the Paleochronology group had 11 dinosaur bone samples carbon dated by the Center for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of Georgia, and for good reason.No, his objection was that the Paleochronology group was using the reports as evidence that dinosaurs lived thousands, not millions, of years ago. A manager of a commercial laboratory that does Carbon-14 dating, Beta Analytic Inc., reviewed a poster display of the dinosaur data and discussed it with a member of the Paleochronology group.So I asked him 3 times over 3 weeks what is the right conclusion to draw from the test results they provided us; then I asked his entire scientific staff. Her interest led us to propose that her company perform a Carbon-14 test on a T-rex bone we acquired.Critics charged that the findings were mistaken or that what she called soft tissue was really biofilm produced by bacteria that had entered from outside the bone.Schweitzer answered the challenge by testing with antibodies.

Leave a Reply

  1. best dating sites for sex in dallas 11-Jan-2020 18:49

    Lak není ani moc hustý ani moc tekutý, takže se netáhne ani nestéká.

  2. stuffed animals dating 20-Feb-2020 07:46

    We provide a fun and entertaining platform where you can meet real girls, guys and couples on webcam and establish genuine and lasting connections.